Please wait a minute...
Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery  2021, Vol. 5 Issue (3): 88-100    DOI: 10.11925/infotech.2096-3467.2020.0515
Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
A Prediction Model with Network Representation Learning and Topic Model for Author Collaboration
Zhang Xin1,Wen Yi1,2(),Xu Haiyun1,2
1Chengdu Library and Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China
2Department of Library, Information and Archives Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
Download: PDF (4073 KB)   HTML ( 16
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

[Objective] This paper proposes a method to predict scientific collaboration based on the network representation learning and author topic model. [Methods] First, we established the embedding vector representation of authors with the help of network representation learning method. Then, we calculated the structural similarity of authors with cosine similarity. Third, we obtained the topic representation of authors with the author-topic model, and computed the authors’ topic similarity with Hellinger distance. Finally, we linearly merged the two similarity measures, and used the Bayesian optimization method for the hyperparameter selection. [Results] We examined the proposed method with the NIPS datasets and found the best node2vec+ATM model after Bayesian parameter selection. It had an AUC value of 0.9271, which was 0.1856 higher than that of the benchmark model. [Limitations] We did not include the author’s institution and geographic location to the model. [Conclusions] The proposed model utilizes structure and content features to improve the prediction results of network representation learning.

Key wordsNetwork Representation Learning      Author Topic Model      Model Fusion      Scientific Collaboration Prediction     
Received: 03 June 2020      Published: 24 November 2020
ZTFLH:  G350  
Fund:National Natural Science Foundation of China(71704170);nformatization Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences(XXH13506-203);Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences(2016159)
Corresponding Authors: Wen Yi     E-mail:

Cite this article:

Zhang Xin,Wen Yi,Xu Haiyun. A Prediction Model with Network Representation Learning and Topic Model for Author Collaboration. Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery, 2021, 5(3): 88-100.

URL:     OR

Research Methods and Processes
DeepWalk Pipeline[15]
SDNE Model[19]
Probability Graph Representation of the Topic Model
基准算法 参数设置
LE 向量维数为128
Graph Factorization 向量维数为128
DeepWalk 向量维数为128,每个节点开始的随机游走数目为10,每个节点开始的随机游走步长为80,skip-gram模型窗口大小为10
LINE 向量维数为128,取混合一阶近似和二阶近似,负采样数目为5
node2vec 向量维数为128,游走参数p=0.25,q=0.25,每个节点开始的随机游走数目为10,每个节点开始的随机游走步长为80,skip-gram模型窗口大小为10
SDNE 向量维数为128,隐层神经元个数为1 000,控制一阶近似的超参数α=10-6,构造矩阵B的超参数β=5,自编码器中的L1损失参数μ1=10-5,L2损失参数μ2 =10-4,批次大小取200,学习率为0.01
TADW 向量维数为128
CANE 向量维数为128
Baseline Algorithms and Parameter Settings
Result of node2vec
主题 代表词
model human feature neuron spike task architecture response neural brain study input visual region population mechanism activity natural level implement
model inference process Bayesian structure variable gaussian approach latent distribution probabilistic variational tree datum method likelihood generative posterior Markov graphical
datum show result large method well scale propose number set achieve high performance dataset paper algorithm parameter require order experiment
network miss neural image learn deep object train representation layer convolutional recognition information recurrent code different learning noisy model visual
algorithm problem function method optimization result gradient convex show bound stochastic loss convergence study guarantee learning online set regret rate
learn feature datum method kernel task approach propose learning label base classification graph problem art clustering dataset cluster metric class
sample sparse distribution matrix estimate estimation analysis problem estimator point statistical dimensional non provide show high regression low error consider
time state dynamic learn system decision policy optimal search action approach control problem base information reinforcement space user reward value
Research Topics Extracted by Author-Topic Model
Authors’ Distribution Obtained by ATM
算法 正确率 召回率 AUC值
原模型 X+ATM 原模型 X+ATM 原模型 连接 X+ATM
ATM 0.003 0 1.000 0 0.500 0
LE 0.966 6 0.940 1 0.449 9 0.594 8 0.709 1 0.628 4 0.768 1
GF 0.996 0 0.993 0 0.008 3 0.046 9 0.505 7 0.608 2 0.521 4
DeepWalk 0.992 2 0.972 3 0.223 8 0.537 4 0.609 2 0.569 3 0.755 5
LINE 0.199 7 0.059 9 0.961 3 0.997 5 0.579 4 0.603 3 0.527 3
node2vec 0.979 5 0.878 8 0.502 1 0.811 4 0.741 5 0.735 0 0.845 2
SDNE 0.543 4 0.432 6 0.561 3 0.726 5 0.552 3 0.552 3 0.579 1
TADW 0.977 6 0.375 1 0.677 3
CANE 0.992 5 0.328 1 0.661 4
Results of the Fusion Model
迭代次数 α AUC值 迭代次数 α AUC值
1 0.417 0 0.862 8 8 0.560 2 0.922 1
2 0.720 3 0.881 7 9 0.592 7 0.922 9
3 0.000 1 0.500 0 10 0.581 3 0.927 1
4 0.302 3 0.777 6 11 0.580 5 0.926 8
5 1.000 0 0.809 7 12 0.580 2 0.926 6
6 0.577 4 0.926 0 13 0.578 8 0.926 3
7 0.599 2 0.924 2 14 0.578 4 0.926 2
Parameter Selection Process Based on Bayesian Optimization of node2vec+ATM Model
Bayesian Optimization Results
模型 最优融合参数 AUC值
LE+ATM 0.427 4 0.830 9
Graph Factorization+ATM 0.219 6 0.676 6
DeepWalk+ATM 0.344 9 0.835 4
LINE+ATM 0.999 9 0.577 5
node2vec+ATM 0.581 3 0.927 1
SDNE+ATM 0.359 2 0.555 5
Optimal Fusion Parameter Values for Several Fusion Models and Corresponding AUC Values
合作者 Yoshua Bengio Geoffrey E.Hinton Yann LeCun
1 Pascal Vincent Sam T. Roweis John S. Denker
2 David S. Touretzky Christopher K. I. Williams Rob Fergus
3 Samy Bengio Richard S. Zemel Corinna Cortes
4 Yann LeCun Max Welling Vladimir Vapnik
5 Ruslan R. Salakhutdinov Ilya Sutskever Yoshua Bengio
6 Mitsuo Kawato Ruslan R. Salakhutdinov Alex Waibel
7 John S. Denker Brendan J. Frey Bartlett W. Mel
8 Ilya Sutskever Peter Dayan Andrew Zisserman
9 Geoffrey E. Hinton Yee W. The Christof Koch
10 Yoram Singer Lawrence K. Saul Tomaso Poggio
Author Cooperation Prediction Results
[1] Newman M E J. Coauthorship Networks and Patterns of Scientific Collaboration[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of the United States of America, 2004,101(S1):5200-5205.
[2] Liben‐Nowell D, Kleinberg J. The Link‐Prediction Problem for Social Networks[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007,58(7):1019-1031.
[3] 吕琳媛. 复杂网络链路预测[J]. 电子科技大学学报, 2010,39(5):651-661.
[3] ( Lv Linyuan. Link Prediction in Complex Networks[J]. Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2010,39(5):651-661.)
[4] Guns R, Rousseau R. Recommending Research Collaborations Using Link Prediction and Random Forest Classifiers[J]. Scientometrics, 2014,101(2):1461-1473.
[5] Yan E, Guns R. Predicting and Recommending Collaborations: An Author-, Institution-, and Country-Level Analysis[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2014,8(2):295-309.
[6] 汪志兵, 韩文民, 孙竹梅, 等. 基于网络拓扑结构与节点属性特征融合的科研合作预测研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2019,42(8):116-120, 109.
[6] ( Wang Zhibing, Han Wenmin, Sun Zhumei, et al. Research on Scientific Collaboration Prediction Based on the Combination of Network Topology and Node Attributes[J]. Information Studies: Theory & Application, 2019,42(8):116-120, 109.)
[7] 单嵩岩, 吴振新. 面向作者消歧和合作预测领域的作者相似度算法述评[J]. 东北师大学报(自然科学版), 2019,51(2):71-80.
[7] ( Shan Songyan, Wu Zhenxin. Review on the Author Similarity Algorithm in the Field of Author Name Disambiguation and Research Collaboration Prediction[J]. Journal of Northeast Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2019,51(2):71-80.)
[8] 张金柱, 于文倩, 刘菁婕, 等. 基于网络表示学习的科研合作预测研究[J]. 情报学报, 2018,37(2):132-139.
[8] ( Zhang Jinzhu, Yu Wenqian, Liu Jingjie, et al. Predicting Research Collaborations Based on Network Embedding[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2018,37(2):132-139.)
[9] 余传明, 林奥琛, 钟韵辞, 等. 基于网络表示学习的科研合作推荐研究[J]. 情报学报, 2019,38(5):500-511.
[9] ( Yu Chuanming, Lin Aochen, Zhong Yunci, et al. Scientific Collaboration Recommendation Based on Network Embedding[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2019,38(5):500-511.)
[10] Balasubramanian M, Schwartz E L. The Isomap Algorithm and Topological Stability[J]. Science, 2002,295(5552):7.
pmid: 11778013
[11] Roweis S T, Saul L K. Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction by Locally Linear Embedding[J]. Science, 2000,290(5500):2323-2326.
[12] Belkin M, Niyogi P. Laplacian Eigenmaps and Spectral Techniques for Embedding and Clustering[C]// Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems: Natural and Synthetic. 2002: 585-591.
[13] Chen M, Yang Q, Tang X O. Directed Graph Embedding[C]// Proceedings of the 20th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2007: 2707-2712.
[14] Ahmed A, Shervashidze N, Narayanamurthy S, et al. Distributed Large-Scale Natural Graph Factorization[C]// Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 2013: 37-48.
[15] Perozzi B, Al-Rfou R, Skiena S. DeepWalk: Online Learning of Social Representations[C]// Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 2014: 701-710.
[16] Grover A, Leskovec J. node2vec: Scalable Feature Learning for Networks[C]// Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 2016: 855-864.
[17] Cao S S, Lu W, Xu Q K. GraRep: Learning Graph Representations with Global Structural Information[C]// Proceedings of the 24th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. ACM, 2015: 891-900.
[18] Tang J, Qu M, Wang M Z, et al. LINE: Large-Scale Information Network Embedding[C]// Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web. 2015: 1067-1077.
[19] Wang D X, Cui P, Zhu W W. Structural Deep Network Embedding[C]// Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 2016: 1225-1234.
[20] Ou M D, Cui P, Pei J, et al. Asymmetric Transitivity Preserving Graph Embedding[C]// Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 2016: 1105-1114.
[21] Kipf T N, Welling M. Variational Graph Auto-Encoders[OL]. arXiv Preprint, arXiv: 1611.07308,2016.
[22] Wang H W, Wang J, Wang J L, et al. GraphGAN: Graph Representation Learning with Generative Adversarial Nets[J]. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, DOI:10.1109/TKDE.2019.2961882.
doi: 10.1109/TKDE.2012.149 pmid: 24693210
[23] Yang C, Liu Z Y, Zhao D L, et al. Network Representation Learning with Rich Text Information[C]// Proceeding of the 24th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2015: 2111-2117.
[24] Sun X F, Guo J, Ding X, et al. A General Framework for Content-Enhanced Network Representation Learning[OL]. arXiv Preprint, arXiv: 1610.02906,2016.
[25] Tu C C, Liu H, Liu Z Y, et al. CANE: Context-Aware Network Embedding for Relation Modeling[C]// Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2017: 1722-1731.
[26] Lerer A, Wu L, Shen J J, et al. PyTorch-BigGraph: A Large-scale Graph Embedding System[C]// Proceedings of the Conference on Systems and Machine Learning. 2019.
[27] Fey M, Lenssen J E. Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometric[OL]. arXiv Preprint, arXiv Preprint, arXiv: 1903.02428,2019.
[28] Zhu Z C, Xu S Z, Tang J, et al. GraphVite: A High-Performance CPU-GPU Hybrid System for Node Embedding[C]// Proceedings of the World Wide Web Conference. ACM, 2019: 2494-2504.
[29] Blei D M, Ng A Y, Jordan M I. Latent Dirichlet Allocation[J]. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2003,3:993-1022.
[30] Rosen-Zvi M, Griffiths T, Steyvers M, et al. The Author-Topic Model for Authors and Documents[C]// Proceedings of the 20th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. AUAI Press, 2004: 487-494.
[31] Snoek J, Larochelle H, Adams R P. Practical Bayesian Optimization of Machine Learning Algorithms[C]// Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 2012: 2951-2959.
[32] LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. Deep Learning[J]. Nature, 2015,521(7553):436.
doi: 10.1038/nature14539 pmid: 26017442
[33] Zhang J, Dong Y X, Wang Y, et al. ProNE: Fast and Scalable Network Representation Learning[C]// Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI'19). 2019: 4278-4284
[34] Qiu J Z, Dong Y X, Ma H, et al. NetSMF: Large-Scale Network Embedding as Sparse Matrix Factorization[C]// Proceedings of the World Wide Web Conference. ACM, 2019: 1509-1520.
[1] Ding Yong,Chen Xi,Jiang Cuiqing,Wang Zhao. Predicting Online Ratings with Network Representation Learning and XGBoost[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2020, 4(11): 52-62.
[2] Chuanming Yu,Haonan Li,Manyi Wang,Tingting Huang,Lu An. Knowledge Representation Based on Deep Learning:Network Perspective[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2020, 4(1): 63-75.
  Copyright © 2016 Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery   Tel/Fax:(010)82626611-6626,82624938