Please wait a minute...
Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery  2023, Vol. 7 Issue (8): 163-174    DOI: 10.11925/infotech.2096-3467.2022.0732
Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Evaluating Academic Impacts of Traditional Chinese Medicine Scholars Based on Weighted Academic Traces
Ma Sijia1,2,Zhao Yue1,Tong Yuanyuan2,Meng Fanhong2,Li Zhiyong3,Li Yanwen2()
1School of Information Engineering, Minzu University of China, Beijing 100081, China
2Institute of Information on Traditional Chinese Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China
3Institute of Chinese Material Medical, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China
Download: PDF (719 KB)   HTML ( 11 ) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

[Objective] This paper proposes an improved academic trace method and quantitatively evaluates the academic impacts of traditional Chinese medicine scholars. It aims to improve the evaluation system of traditional Chinese medicine talents. [Methods] Based on the academic trace method of author position weight, we proposed a weight calculation method of academic trace using the contribution of corresponding authors and journal impact factors. [Results] We compared the performance of four academic trace methods. The proposed one yielded significantly better results and rankings than the others. We also verified the rationality and effectiveness of the proposed method with the award-winning information and Q-index. [Limitations] The evaluation research based on weight academic trace is only carried out for the English papers of traditional Chinese medicine scholars, and the subsequent experiments will be carried out to verify the Chinese papers of scholars and other scholars in the field of traditional Chinese medicine.[Conclusions] The proposed weighted academic trace method could effectively evaluate the impacts of scholars in traditional Chinese medicine.
Key words： Academic Trace      Author Contribution Weight      Journal Impact Factors      Academic Influence     
Received: 15 July 2022      Published: 08 October 2023
ZTFLH:  R2-03  
  G353  
Fund:Scientific and Technological Innovation Project of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences(CI2021A00503)
Corresponding Authors: Li Yanwen，ORCID：0000-0003-0584-159X，E-mail：liyanwen80@sina.com。   
Service
E-mail this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Sijia Ma
Yue Zhao
Yuanyuan Tong
Fanhong Meng
Zhiyong Li
Yanwen Li

Cite this article:

Ma Sijia, Zhao Yue, Tong Yuanyuan, Meng Fanhong, Li Zhiyong, Li Yanwen. Evaluating Academic Impacts of Traditional Chinese Medicine Scholars Based on Weighted Academic Traces. Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery, 2023, 7(8): 163-174.

URL:

https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/EN/10.11925/infotech.2096-3467.2022.0732     OR     https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/EN/Y2023/V7/I8/163

Ranking Distribution of the Number of Publications and Citations
学者
编号		 X1 Y2 Z3 T Xw1 Yw2 Zw3 Tw Xwc1 Ywc2 Zwc3 Twc Xwf1 Ywf2 Zwf3 Twf
学者1 4.92 2.04 133.46 140.43 5.90 4.01 1.35 11.25 2.45 7.77 2.91 13.13 3.72 3.93 21.63 29.27
学者2 16.53 17.53 489.27 523.33 17.98 32.79 14.04 64.80 15.22 39.15 7.63 62.00 17.86 30.30 110.20 158.36
学者3 13.47 1.12 334.61 349.20 14.04 9.29 25.61 48.93 11.64 16.28 15.97 43.89 14.96 3.66 109.97 128.58
学者4 17.25 199.22 242.07 458.54 10.66 79.87 30.11 120.65 8.24 182.30 8.17 198.71 13.66 118.21 476.49 608.36
学者5 26.04 0.53 277.27 303.83 14.95 58.99 1.00 74.94 14.68 56.31 1.71 72.70 21.98 19.68 91.96 133.62
学者6 19.51 181.64 266.70 467.86 6.15 141.69 25.65 173.49 8.34 141.45 14.26 164.06 13.35 141.55 224.78 379.68
学者7 15.21 7.67 367.11 389.99 13.00 33.88 1.76 48.65 10.50 41.56 2.95 55.01 17.87 12.64 77.28 107.79
学者8 9.31 0.78 227.15 237.23 18.72 3.14 4.48 26.34 14.92 6.93 5.18 27.03 13.28 0.63 98.29 112.20
学者9 20.51 32.62 291.18 344.31 9.67 89.29 11.73 110.68 8.14 95.28 7.58 111.00 15.14 55.76 105.46 176.36
学者10 24.98 28.07 194.38 247.43 10.13 55.54 2.90 68.57 10.51 49.87 6.90 67.28 14.01 36.52 254.40 304.93
学者11 13.47 2.24 166.28 181.99 8.67 17.73 3.07 29.47 10.60 18.44 15.60 44.64 8.52 3.90 188.01 200.42
学者12 8.65 21.30 48.52 78.47 6.16 31.85 1.90 39.92 7.25 29.12 1.35 37.71 6.68 13.95 68.78 89.41
学者13 15.21 287.00 118.36 420.58 7.67 160.00 4.52 172.18 7.46 143.88 3.52 154.86 9.63 118.78 287.65 416.05
学者14 20.25 321.73 174.46 516.44 8.77 224.10 19.00 251.88 7.68 252.30 12.23 272.21 14.11 217.46 378.87 610.44
学者15 19.70 17.00 241.29 278.00 8.60 52.08 2.48 63.15 10.31 74.17 3.39 87.87 17.14 31.52 64.99 113.65
学者16 9.00 0.00 137.04 146.04 7.55 6.33 0.40 14.28 4.51 6.87 3.66 15.04 3.30 2.62 58.75 64.67
学者17 13.24 0.49 155.21 168.93 12.59 11.17 1.68 25.45 14.24 10.49 0.88 25.61 8.62 5.09 79.38 93.09
学者18 10.00 0.00 229.69 239.69 14.64 4.99 8.84 28.46 18.98 3.13 4.59 26.70 12.79 0.64 74.31 87.74
学者19 5.00 0.00 75.21 80.21 4.86 2.13 1.57 8.57 4.10 1.96 4.99 11.05 7.27 0.05 24.45 31.77
学者20 16.33 555.77 277.95 850.05 8.97 210.91 17.77 237.66 7.95 246.86 9.77 264.59 12.05 169.85 783.54 965.44
学者21 20.64 90.38 432.98 544.00 9.55 106.86 20.73 137.14 11.86 88.33 34.37 134.56 14.64 67.67 379.80 462.12
学者22 14.81 0.62 268.85 284.29 6.32 19.46 -2.00 23.77 7.59 27.35 0.03 34.97 9.30 4.20 56.65 70.15
学者23 16.41 1.20 245.66 263.27 7.61 11.75 4.12 23.47 8.57 23.16 1.37 33.09 7.84 11.70 58.83 78.37
学者24 8.10 0.00 202.86 210.96 10.74 4.98 0.20 15.92 25.65 1.25 2.94 29.84 9.55 0.34 105.98 115.87
学者25 19.06 718.08 133.05 870.20 8.68 273.90 4.58 287.16 6.23 293.31 2.63 302.17 11.21 343.33 423.26 777.79
学者26 14.78 1 253.59 87.60 1 355.97 5.62 180.64 1.54 187.80 5.10 436.96 6.29 448.35 12.14 542.04 196.05 750.22
学者27 22.69 59.59 354.11 436.39 15.40 43.47 5.32 64.19 11.92 68.39 54.90 135.22 17.18 41.18 451.05 509.41
学者28 13.47 0.39 547.32 561.18 7.11 20.22 2.13 29.46 10.64 16.67 5.01 32.32 11.63 7.48 81.74 100.85
学者29 9.48 2 604.73 225.97 2 840.18 6.11 361.70 14.62 382.43 5.40 471.84 7.05 484.30 9.58 551.13 425.66 986.37
学者30 16.69 12.96 196.01 225.66 9.83 33.77 4.88 48.49 9.27 35.85 5.37 50.49 9.17 18.06 216.69 243.92
学者31 21.44 15.61 208.11 245.17 9.94 32.79 4.48 47.20 7.92 28.95 4.58 41.44 9.80 30.25 64.96 105.02
学者32 14.67 10.05 373.54 398.26 10.43 42.19 10.64 63.25 12.92 44.14 8.65 65.71 19.04 4.26 231.17 254.47
学者33 19.18 24.53 243.36 287.08 7.94 69.97 2.12 80.03 6.43 57.88 6.60 70.91 15.09 49.52 58.54 123.15
学者34 24.47 56.13 459.73 540.33 10.62 101.49 4.49 116.60 13.42 102.11 21.94 137.47 16.03 60.07 587.83 663.93
学者35 23.03 251.82 200.15 474.99 10.21 150.82 2.30 163.33 11.39 196.46 1.88 209.72 18.43 165.47 199.25 383.15
学者36 14.77 1 555.44 291.36 1 861.56 6.32 350.54 2.90 359.76 9.10 309.53 23.91 342.53 12.35 469.62 417.47 899.44
学者37 8.33 0.82 156.00 165.16 4.95 14.57 1.19 20.71 7.79 8.28 4.41 20.48 7.75 3.64 60.10 71.49
学者38 21.16 1.19 253.60 275.95 15.48 15.67 24.30 55.45 16.88 23.22 11.46 51.56 15.82 16.58 118.01 150.41
学者39 9.00 0.00 447.95 456.95 17.55 3.27 10.47 31.29 12.07 4.82 9.67 26.56 16.45 1.22 70.39 88.06
学者40 8.75 10 383.22 613.96 11 005.93 8.46 768.44 16.59 793.49 5.59 1 678.07 18.62 1 702.29 12.60 3 080.79 582.49 3 675.87
Academic Trace Results of Four Methods
学者编号 Tw相对于T减小的百分比 Twc相对于T减小的百分比 Twc相对于Tw增大的百分比 Twf相对于Twc增大的百分比
学者1 91.99% 90.65% 16.67% 160.12%
学者2 87.62% 88.15% -4.32% 144.38%
学者3 85.99% 87.43% -10.30% 162.80%
学者4 73.69% 56.67% 64.70% 404.25%
学者5 75.33% 76.07% -2.99% 78.29%
学者6 62.92% 64.93% -5.44% 118.85%
学者7 87.53% 85.89% 13.08% 121.59%
学者8 88.90% 88.61% 2.62% 326.04%
学者9 67.85% 67.76% 0.28% 59.34%
学者10 72.29% 72.81% -1.87% 344.71%
学者11 83.80% 75.47% 51.46% 579.99%
学者12 49.13% 51.94% -5.53% 123.97%
学者13 59.06% 63.18% -10.06% 141.64%
学者14 51.23% 47.29% 8.07% 142.36%
学者15 77.28% 68.39% 39.14% 79.95%
学者16 90.22% 89.70% 5.35% 352.98%
学者17 84.94% 84.84% 0.65% 265.84%
学者18 88.12% 88.86% -6.20% 208.26%
学者19 89.32% 86.22% 28.97% 270.75%
学者20 72.04% 68.87% 11.33% 306.23%
学者21 74.79% 75.26% -1.88% 236.96%
学者22 91.64% 87.70% 47.10% 195.08%
学者23 91.08% 87.43% 40.98% 233.88%
学者24 92.45% 85.86% 87.43% 627.83%
学者25 67.00% 65.28% 5.23% 170.85%
学者26 86.15% 66.93% 138.74% 299.48%
学者27 85.29% 69.01% 110.65% 693.60%
学者28 94.75% 94.24% 9.70% 242.34%
学者29 86.54% 82.95% 26.64% 157.92%
学者30 78.51% 77.63% 4.13% 403.05%
学者31 80.75% 83.10% -12.20% 122.49%
学者32 84.12% 83.50% 3.87% 302.29%
学者33 72.12% 75.30% -11.40% 53.88%
学者34 78.42% 74.56% 17.90% 469.43%
学者35 65.61% 55.85% 28.41% 134.59%
学者36 80.67% 81.60% -4.79% 150.01%
学者37 87.46% 87.60% -1.11% 245.16%
学者38 79.91% 81.32% -7.02% 171.26%
学者39 93.15% 94.19% -15.13% 181.41%
学者40 92.79% 84.53% 114.53% 363.26%
Change of Academic Trace Value of Four Methods
学者编号 T Tw Twc Twf
学者40 1 1 1 1
学者29 2 2 2 2
学者36 3 3 4 4
学者26 4 7 3 6
学者25 5 4 5 5
学者20 6 6 7 3
学者28 7 30 31 30
学者21 8 11 14 11
学者34 9 13 12 7
学者2 10 18 21 20
学者14 11 5 6 8
学者35 12 10 8 13
学者6 13 8 10 14
学者4 14 12 9 9
学者39 15 28 35 33
学者27 16 19 13 10
学者13 17 9 11 12
学者32 18 20 20 16
学者7 19 24 22 28
学者3 20 23 26 23
学者9 21 14 15 19
学者5 22 16 17 22
学者33 23 15 18 24
学者22 24 34 29 37
学者15 25 21 16 26
学者38 26 22 23 21
学者23 27 35 30 35
学者10 28 17 19 15
学者31 29 26 27 29
学者18 30 31 34 34
学者8 31 32 33 27
学者30 32 25 24 17
学者24 33 37 32 25
学者11 34 29 25 18
学者17 35 33 36 31
学者37 36 36 37 36
学者16 37 38 38 38
学者1 38 39 39 40
学者19 39 40 40 39
学者12 40 27 28 32
Academic Trace Value by Four Methods
Twf排序 学者编号 获奖条数 Twf排序 学者编号 获奖条数
1 学者40 10 21 学者38 0
2 学者29 1 22 学者5 0
3 学者20 2 23 学者3 0
4 学者36 6 24 学者33 1
5 学者25 1 25 学者24 1
6 学者26 5 26 学者15 1
7 学者34 2 27 学者8 0
8 学者14 3 28 学者7 1
9 学者4 1 29 学者31 1
10 学者27 3 30 学者28 1
11 学者21 2 31 学者17 0
12 学者13 7 32 学者12 1
13 学者35 2 33 学者39 3
14 学者6 1 34 学者18 1
15 学者10 2 35 学者23 0
16 学者32 0 36 学者37 0
17 学者30 0 37 学者22 0
18 学者11 1 38 学者16 0
19 学者9 2 39 学者19 0
20 学者2 1 40 学者1 0
Statistics on the Number of Awards at or above the Provincial and Ministerial Level
指标 T Tw Twc Twf P1 C1 P2 C2 Pn Cn
T 1
Tw 0.884** 1
Twc 0.972** 0.944** 1
Twf 0.953** 0.945** 0.983** 1
P1 0.011 0.321* 0.151 0.163 1
C1 -0.001 0.300 0.135 0.167 0.969** 1
P2 0.147 0.481** 0.292 0.330* 0.620** 0.611** 1
C2 0.164 0.512** 0.320* 0.364* 0.654** 0.628** 0.904** 1
Pn 0.971** 0.941** 0.981** 0.963** 0.049 0.032 0.277 0.278 1
Cn 0.982** 0.934** 0.986** 0.973** 0.037 0.022 0.223 0.247 0.994** 1
Pearson Correlation Analysis
学者编号 Twf值排序 Q指数值
学者40 1 46.45
学者29 2 33.48
学者36 4 43.96
学者25 5 42.18
学者26 6 37.37
Comparison Between Twf Value and Q-index Value
[1] Hirsch J E. An Index to Quantify an Individual’s Scientific Research Output[J]. PNAS, 2005, 102(46): 16569-16572.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0507655102 pmid: 16275915
[2] 杜建, 张玢. 作者合作视角下的h指数计量方法:比较与归纳[J]. 图书情报工作, 2011, 55(24): 52-55, 136.
[2] (Du Jian, Zhang Bin. Review on Calculating Methods of h-index Based on Co-Authorship[J]. Library and Information Service, 2011, 55(24): 52-55, 136.)
[3] Leydesdorff L, Bornmann L. Integrated Impact Indicators Compared with Impact Factors: An Alternative Research Design with Policy Implications[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011, 62(11): 2133-2146.
doi: 10.1002/asi.v62.11
[4] Ye F Y, Leydesdorff L. The “Academic Trace” of the Performance Matrix: A Mathematical Synthesis of the H-Index and the Integrated Impact Indicator (I3)[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014, 65(4): 742-750.
doi: 10.1002/asi.2014.65.issue-4
[5] 薛霏, 叶鹰. 大学的学术矩阵和学术迹探讨[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2014, 32(1): 25-29.
[5] (Xue Fei, Ye Ying. The Academic Matrices and Traces of Universities[J]. Journal of Academic Libraries, 2014, 32(1): 25-29.)
[6] 叶鹰. 国际学术评价指标研究现状及发展综述[J]. 情报学报, 2014, 33(2): 215-224.
[6] (Ye Ying. The Research Progress and Developing Perspective of Assessment Indicators[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2014, 33(2): 215-224.)
[7] 孙竹梅, 华薇娜. 学科发展的学术迹和学术矩阵探析[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2016, 36(1): 36-41.
[7] (Sun Zhumei, Hua Weina. Analysis of the Discipline Development Based on Academic Trace and Academic Matrix[J]. Library Tribune, 2016, 36(1): 36-41.)
[8] 苏云梅, 武建光. 关于学术评价指标——学术迹的探讨[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2015, 38(12): 7-9.
[8] (Su Yunmei, Wu Jianguang. Discussion on Academic Evaluation Index-Academic Trace[J]. Information Studies: Theory & Application, 2015, 38(12): 7-9.)
[9] 唐继瑞, 叶鹰. 单篇论著学术迹与影响矩比较研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2015, 41(2): 4-16.
[9] (Tang Jirui, Ye Ying. A Comparative Study of Academic Trace and Impact Torque on Single Publication[J]. Journal of Library Science in China, 2015, 41(2): 4-16.)
[10] 唐璞妮, 徐苑琳. 基于作者贡献权重的学术迹在学者学术影响力评价中的应用[J]. 情报资料工作, 2018(2): 19-23.
[10] (Tang Puni, Xu Yuanlin. Application of Contribution Weight of Authors-Based Academic Trace in Scholars’ Academic Influence Evaluation[J]. Information and Documentation Services, 2018(2): 19-23.)
[11] 徐义涛, 文庭孝. 学术迹及其应用研究的综述[J]. 情报探索, 2021(2): 123-128.
[11] (Xu Yitao, Wen Tingxiao. A Review of Academic Trace and Its Application Research[J]. Information Research, 2021(2): 123-128.)
[12] Ye F Y, Rousseau R. Probing the h-Core: An Investigation of the Tail-Core Ratio for Rank Distributions[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 84(2): 431-439.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0099-6
[13] Chen D Z, Huang M H, Ye F Y. A Probe into Dynamic Measures for h-core and h-tail[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2013, 7(1): 129-137.
doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2012.10.002
[14] Zhang C T. The e-index, Complementing the h-index for Excess Citations[J]. PLoS One, 2017, 4(5): e5429.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005429
[15] Zhang C T. The h'-index, Effectively Improving the h-index Based on the Citation Distribution[J]. PLoS One, 2017, 8(4): e59912.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059912
[16] Shen H W, Barabási A L. Collective Credit Allocation in Science[J]. PNAS, 2014, 111(34): 12325-12330.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1401992111
[17] Abbas A M. Weighted Indices for Evaluating the Quality of Research with Multiple Authorship[J]. Scientometrics, 2011, 88(1): 107-131.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0389-7
[18] Sinatra R, Wang D, Deville P, et al. Quantifying the Evolution of Individual Scientific Impact[J]. Science, 2016, 354(6312): aaf5239.
doi: 10.1126/science.aaf5239
[19] 石晓迪. QAb指数及其在机构评价中的实证研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2020.
[19] (Shi Xiaodi. QAb Index and Its Empirical Study in Institutional Evaluation[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2020.)
[20] 朱毅华, 石晓迪. Q指数的改进及其实证研究[J]. 情报探索, 2020(10): 1-7.
[20] (Zhu Yihua, Shi Xiaodi. Improvement of the Q Index and Empirical Research[J]. Information Research, 2020(10): 1-7.)
[1] Liu Junwan,Yang Bo,Wang Feifei. Ranking Scholarly Impacts Based on Citations and Academic Similarity[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2018, 2(4): 59-70.
  Copyright © 2016 Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery   Tel/Fax:(010)82626611-6626，82624938   E-mail:jishu@mail.las.ac.cn