Please wait a minute...
Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery  2024, Vol. 8 Issue (1): 1-15    DOI: 10.11925/infotech.2096-3467.2023.1280
Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
A Review on Methods for Domain Knowledge Evolution Analysis
Li Xuesi1,2,Zhang Zhixiong1,2(),Wang Yufei1,2,Liu Yi1
1National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
2Department of Information Resources Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
Download: PDF (717 KB)   HTML ( 34
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

[Objective] Domain knowledge evolution analysis has been a long-standing research topic in the field of Library and Information Science. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the research methods related to the domain knowledge evolution analysis, both nationally and internationally, aiming to offer valuable references for future studies in this area. [Coverage] We conducted searches in CNKI and Web of Science using keywords related to domain knowledge evolution. The search results were manually evaluated and analyzed, and a total of 84 key literatures closely related to the methods of domain knowledge evolution analysis were selected for review. [Methods] By reviewing the research literature, we clarified the relevant concepts of domain knowledge evolution. Based on this, we classified the existing domain knowledge evolution analysis methods into three categories: citation-based, structure-based and content-based. For each category, we first elucidated the theoretical basis, then explained their basic analytical frameworks and highlighted the relevant advances. Finally, we summarized the existing methods of domain knowledge evolution analysis and provided perspectives. [Results] The three categories of existing methods for domain knowledge evolution analysis rely on their respective scientific theories. With the advancement of technology and the improvement of data resources, these methods are continuously deepening and improving the analytical framework for the study of evolution. Although significant research achievements have been made, there has been no breakthrough in the research perspective of knowledge evolution analysis, and the limitations within the current research paradigm remain unresolved. [Limitations] The review analysis was based on selected literature, which may not have comprehensively covered all relevant research. [Conclusions] Based on the summary and analysis of the current research, we believe that the following two directions are worth focusing on in the future research on domain knowledge evolution analysis: first, exploring new entry points for domain knowledge evolution analysis, and second, attempting to integrate existing research methods to improve the limitations of current analytical approaches.

Key wordsDomain Knowledge      Knowledge Evolution      Evolutionary Analysis     
Received: 21 November 2023      Published: 06 February 2024
ZTFLH:  G350  
Fund:Major Program of the National Social Science Fund of China(21&ZD329);NSTL Demonstration Platform for Semantic Content Retrieval and Analysis(2023XM21)
Corresponding Authors: Zhang Zhixiong,ORCID:0000-0003-1596-7487,E-mail:zhangzhx@mail.las.ac.cn。   

Cite this article:

Li Xuesi, Zhang Zhixiong, Wang Yufei, Liu Yi. A Review on Methods for Domain Knowledge Evolution Analysis. Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery, 2024, 8(1): 1-15.

URL:

https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/EN/10.11925/infotech.2096-3467.2023.1280     OR     https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/EN/Y2024/V8/I1/1

引用关系类型 具体思路 代表文献
直接引用关系 综合文献多个特征信息(如文献的出版期刊、发表时间、学科类目)从不同层面量化直接引用引起的知识流动 [8-9]
以文献的特征信息为基础,提出量化知识流动的新指标 [10-11]
改进量化计算方法,提出更加精确的知识流动量计算方式 [12]
共被引关系 基于文献共被引关系计算文献内容相似度,采用聚类等方法挖掘文献之间的潜在关联,通过其时序变化反映领域研究前沿的发展演化 [16???-20]
基于作者共被引关系计算作者相似度,挖掘作者与文献之间以及作者与作者之间潜在关联,并通过其时序变化揭示领域知识结构的发展变化 [24?-26]
耦合关系 基于文献耦合关系计算文献相似度,采用聚类等方法挖掘文献之间的潜在关联,并通过其时序变化揭示领域知识基础的发展演化 [29?-31]
基于作者耦合关系计算作者相似度,挖掘作者与研究主题之间以及作者与作者之间潜在关联,并通过其时序变化分析领域知识结构的演化情况 [34-35]
Studies Related to Domain Knowledge Evolution Analysis Based on Citation Relationships
引用内容的语义信息 具体思路 代表文献
引用主题 确定引用内容的具体范围(引用句或者引用句上下文等),采用聚类或者主题建模等方法挖掘其中的研究主题,根据研究主题在时间序列上的变化分析领域研究内容的演化 [38?-40]
引用功能 制定引用功能的分类方案,并将引文按照引用功能分类,根据引用功能在不同时间段下的分布情况分析科学文献如何通过不同类型的引用构建领域的整体知识 [41?-43]
Studies Related to Domain Knowledge Evolution Analysis Based on Citation Content
知识网络
结构特征
具体思路 代表
文献
网络节点 通过节点的度、中介性、中心性等网络指标找出知识网络内的重要节点,然后通过重要节点在时间序列上的变化探究领域知识的演化情况 [50?-52]
网络连边 找出构成知识网络主干架构中的关键路径,结合关键路径中边和节点的时间特征分析领域知识的扩散流动,以此反映领域知识的演化脉络 [53???-57]
网络社团 识别知识网络中的社团结构,通过社团的数量、规模、状态等多个维度在时间序列上的变化分析领域知识的发展变化 [58-59]
识别知识网络中的社团结构,对不同时间段下的社团进行相似度分析,基于相似度结果揭示领域知识演化程度、演化内容以及演化路径等 [60-61]
Studies Related to Domain Knowledge Evolution Analysis Based on Structural Feature
知识网络演化模型 具体思路 代表文献
反映知识网络演化特征的通用演化模型 根据知识网络的幂律分布特征分析网络增长过程中节点和边的演化机制,提出择优连接机制,并根据该机制提出反映知识网络动态演化的模型 [63-64]
根据择优连接机制与真实知识网络演化过程之间的差异,融合节点的结构特征或边的特征对择优连接机制进行改进 [66?-68]
反映不同类型知识网络演化特征的特定演化模型 根据知识网络类型的不同(如共词网络、合作网络等),分析影响网络节点增长的具体因素以及网络演化过程中特定的结构特征,并据此提出不同知识网络的演化模型 [69?-71]
Studies Related to Domain Knowledge Evolution Analysis Based on Evolutionary Models
内容词类型 具体思路 代表文献
作者关键词 构建作者关键词共现矩阵,对矩阵进行解析以获取关键词之间的潜在关系,基于关键词关系在时间轴上的变化情况揭示领域知识演化过程 [75-76]
增补关键词 需要先对增补关键词进行预处理(包括关键词标准化、关键词筛选等),在此基础上构建共现矩阵,基于该矩阵挖掘关键词之间的关联,根据关键词关联的时序变化揭示领域知识演化 [77-78]
Studies Related to Domain Knowledge Evolution Analysis Based on Content Words
研究主题演化 具体思路 代表文献
离散性演化分析 通过文本挖掘获取不同时段内文献的研究主题,对比分析研究主题在不同时间段下名称、数量等方面的变化情况,呈现出一种“离散化”分析的特点 [79?-81]
连续性演化分析 通过文本挖掘获取文献的研究主题,计算不同时段下研究主题的相似度,考察主题之间存在的演化关系,以反映领域知识的演化过程 [82??-85]
Studies Related to Domain Knowledge Evolution Analysis Based on Research Topics
[1] 托马斯·库恩. 科学革命的结构[M]. 金吾伦, 胡新和译. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2003.
[1] (Thomas Kuhn. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions[M]. Translated by JinWulun, HuXinhe. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2003.)
[2] 王倩, 钱力, 刘细文. 知识演化分析的技术方法研究综述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023, 67(7): 121-134.
doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2023.07.011
[2] (Wang Qian, Qian Li, Liu Xiwen. A Review on Technical Methods for Knowledge Evolution Analysis[J]. Library and Information Service, 2023, 67(7): 121-134.)
doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2023.07.011
[3] de Solla Price D J. Quantitative Measures of the Development of Science[J]. Archives Internationales d’Histoire des Sciences, 1951, 4(14):85-93.
[4] Garfield E. Citation Indexes for Science. A New Dimension in Documentation Through Association of Ideas[J]. International Journal of Epidemiology, 2006, 35(5): 1123-1127.
pmid: 16987841
[5] 杨中楷, 梁永霞. 专利引文分析的理论与实践[M]. 第1版. 北京: 科学出版社, 2017.
[5] (Yang Zhongkai, Liang Yongxia. The Theory and Practice of Patent Citation Analysis[M]. The 1st Edition. Beijing: Science Press, 2017.)
[6] 梁永霞, 刘则渊, 杨中楷. 引文分析学的知识流动理论探析[J]. 科学学研究, 2010, 28(5): 668-674.
[6] (Liang Yongxia, Liu Zeyuan, Yang Zhongkai. Explore and Discussion on Knowledge Flowing Theory of Citation Analytics[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2010, 28(5): 668-674.)
[7] Small H. Co-Citation in the Scientific Literature: A New Measure of the Relationship Between Two Documents[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1973, 24(4): 265-269.
doi: 10.1002/asi.v24:4
[8] 杨瑞仙, 姜小函. 从学科和期刊的引证视角看交叉学科的知识结构和演化问题——以图书情报学科为例的实证研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(5): 30-39.
doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.05.004
[8] (Yang Ruixian, Jiang Xiaohan. The Knowledge Structure and Evolution of Interdisciplinary Subjects from the Citation Perspective of Discipline and Journals: A Case Study of Library and Information Science[J]. Library and Information Service, 2018, 62(5): 30-39.)
doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.05.004
[9] 李樵. 外部引用视角下的中国图书情报学知识影响力研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2019, 45(6): 65-83.
[9] (Li Qiao. The Impact of Chinese Library and Information Science Knowledge from the Perspective of External Citations[J]. Journal of Library Science in China, 2019, 45(6): 65-83.)
[10] 莫雪盈, 卢龙. 引文视角下知识融合与论文社会影响力关系研究[J]. 信息资源管理学报, 2022, 12(6): 133-141.
[10] (Mo Xueying, Lu Long. Research on the Relationship Between Knowledge Fusion and Papers’ Social Impact from the Perspective of Citation[J]. Journal of Information Resources Management, 2022, 12(6): 133-141.)
[11] González-Alcaide G, Llorente P, Ramos J M. Bibliometric Indicators to Identify Emerging Research Fields: Publications on Mass Gatherings[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 109(2): 1283-1298.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-016-2083-2
[12] Sun Y, Latora V. The Evolution of Knowledge Within and Across Fields in Modern Physics[J]. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10: Article No.12097.
[13] Marshakova-Shaikevich I. System of Document Connections Based on References[J]. Nauchno-Tekhnicheskaya Informatsiya Seriya 2, 1973(6): 3-8.
[14] Small H, Griffith B C. The Structure of Scientific Literatures I: Identifying and Graphing Specialties[J]. Science Studies, 1974, 4(1): 17-40.
doi: 10.1177/030631277400400102
[15] Griffith B C, Small H G, Stonehill J A, et al. The Structure of Scientific Literatures II: Toward a Macro- and Microstructure for Science[J]. Science Studies, 1974, 4(4): 339-365.
doi: 10.1177/030631277400400402
[16] Small H. Macro-Level Changes in the Structure of Co-Citation Clusters: 1983-1989[J]. Scientometrics, 1993, 26(1): 5-20.
doi: 10.1007/BF02016789
[17] Small H. Visualizing Science by Citation Mapping[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1999, 50(9): 799-813.
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:9<>1.0.CO;2-J
[18] Li X R, Qiao H, Wang S Y. Exploring Evolution and Emerging Trends in Business Model Study: A Co-Citation Analysis[J]. Scientometrics, 2017, 111(2): 869-887.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2266-5
[19] 侯跃芳, 崔雷, 吴迪. 应用引文共引聚类-内容词分析法对学科发展的研究[J]. 情报学报, 2007, 26(2): 309-314.
[19] (Hou Yuefang, Cui Lei, Wu Di. Study on the History and the Current Work of a Subject by Combined Co-Citation Cluster and Content Words Analysis[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2007, 26 (2): 309-314.)
[20] Pilkington A, Meredith J. The Evolution of the Intellectual Structure of Operations Management—1980-2006: A Citation/Co-Citation Analysis[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2009, 27(3): 185-202.
doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2008.08.001
[21] White H D, Griffith B C. Author Cocitation: A Literature Measure of Intellectual Structure[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1981, 32(3): 163-171.
doi: 10.1002/asi.v32:3
[22] 邱均平, 张晓培. 基于CSSCI的国内知识管理领域作者共被引分析[J]. 情报科学, 2011, 29(10): 1441-1445.
[22] (Qiu Junping, Zhang Xiaopei. Author Co-Citation Analysis of Knowledge Management in China Based on the CSSCI[J]. Information Science, 2011, 29(10): 1441-1445.)
[23] 林春培, 黄海媚, 吴东儒. 基于作者共被引分析的破坏性创新研究学术群类与脉络探析[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2016, 37(8): 68-81.
[23] (Lin Chunpei, Huang Haimei, Wu Tungju. Scholar Groups and Evolution of Disruptive Innovation Research Based on Author Co-Citation Analysis[J]. Science of Science and Management of S.& T., 2016, 37(8): 68-81.)
[24] White H D, McCain K W. Visualizing a Discipline: An Author Co-Citation Analysis of Information Science, 1972-1995[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1998, 49(4): 327-355.
[25] González-Valiente C L, León Santos M, Arencibia-Jorge R, et al. Mapping the Evolution of Intellectual Structure in Information Management Using Author Co-Citation Analysis[J]. Mobile Networks and Applications, 2021, 26(6): 2374-2388.
doi: 10.1007/s11036-019-01231-9
[26] Ma R M. Discovering and Analyzing the Intellectual Structure and Its Evolution of LIS in China, 1998-2007[J]. Scientometrics, 2012, 93(3): 645-659.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0702-0
[27] Kessler M M. Bibliographic Coupling Between Scientific Papers[J]. American Documentation, 1963, 14(1): 10-25.
doi: 10.1002/asi.v14:1
[28] 邱均平. 信息计量学[M]. 武汉: 武汉大学出版社, 2007.
[28] (Qiu Junping. Information Metrology[M]. Wuhan: Wuhan University Press, 2007.)
[29] Morris S A, Yen G, Wu Z, et al. Time Line Visualization of Research Fronts[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2003, 54(5): 413-422.
doi: 10.1002/asi.v54:5
[30] Huang M H, Chang C P. Detecting Research Fronts in OLED Field Using Bibliographic Coupling with Sliding Window[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 98(3): 1721-1744.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-013-1126-1
[31] 肖明, 李国俊, 袁浩. 基于引文耦合的数字图书馆研究结构可视化分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2010, 54(7): 51-54.
[31] (Xiao Ming, Li Guojun, Yuan Hao. Visualization Analysis of Research Fronts of Digital Library Based on Bibliographic Coupling Analysis[J]. Library and Information Service, 2010, 54(7): 51-54.)
[32] 邱均平, 刘国徽. 国内耦合分析方法研究现状与展望[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014, 58(7): 131-136.
[32] (Qiu Junping, Liu Guohui. Research Status and Prospect of Coupling Analysis Method in China[J]. Library and Information Service, 2014, 58(7): 131-136.)
[33] Zhao D Z, Strotmann A. Evolution of Research Activities and Intellectual Influences in Information Science 1996-2005: Introducing Author Bibliographic-Coupling Analysis[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2008, 59(13): 2070-2086.
doi: 10.1002/asi.v59:13
[34] 马瑞敏, 倪超群. 作者耦合分析: 一种新学科知识结构发现方法的探索性研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2012, 38(2): 4-11.
[34] (Ma Ruimin, Ni Chaoqun. Author Coupling Analysis: An Exploratory Study on a New Approach to Discover Intellectual Structure of a Discipline[J]. Journal of Library Science in China, 2012, 38(2): 4-11.)
[35] Yang S L, Han R Z, Wolfram D, et al. Visualizing the Intellectual Structure of Information Science (2006-2015): Introducing Author Keyword Coupling Analysis[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2016, 10(1): 132-150.
doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2015.12.003
[36] Small H. Co-Citation Context Analysis and the Structure of Paradigms[J]. Journal of Documentation, 1980, 36(3): 183-196.
doi: 10.1108/eb026695
[37] Small H, Greenlee E. Citation Context Analysis of a Co-Citation Cluster: Recombinant-DNA[J]. Scientometrics, 1980, 2(4): 277-301.
doi: 10.1007/BF02016349
[38] 张金柱, 仇蒙蒙, 王秋月. 基于引用内容聚类的文献被引主题识别及其演化分析[J]. 情报科学, 2023, 41(2): 107-117.
[38] (Zhang Jinzhu, Qiu Mengmeng, Wang Qiuyue. Citation Topic Identification and Evolution Based on Citation Content Clustering[J]. Information Science, 2023, 41(2): 107-117.)
[39] Jebari C, Herrera-Viedma E, Cobo M J. The Use of Citation Context to Detect the Evolution of Research Topics: A Large-Scale Analysis[J]. Scientometrics, 2021, 126(4): 2971-2989.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-020-03858-y
[40] 张艺蔓, 马秀峰, 程结晶. 融合引文内容和全文本引文分析的知识流动研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2015, 34(11): 50-54.
[40] (Zhang Yiman, Ma Xiufeng, Cheng Jiejing. Research of Knowledge Flows Based on Citation Content Analysis[J]. Journal of Intelligence, 2015, 34(11): 50-54.)
[41] Petrovich E. Accumulation of Knowledge in Para-Scientific Areas: The Case of Analytic Philosophy[J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 116(2): 1123-1151.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-018-2796-5
[42] Jurgens D, Kumar S, Hoover R, et al. Measuring the Evolution of a Scientific Field Through Citation Frames[J]. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2018, 6: 391-406.
doi: 10.1162/tacl_a_00028
[43] 陈颖芳, 马晓雷. 基于引用内容与功能分析的科学知识发展演进规律研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2020, 39(3): 71-80.
[43] (Chen Yingfang, Ma Xiaolei. Measuring the Developmental Trend of a Knowledge Domain Through Citation Content and Citation Function Analysis[J]. Journal of Intelligence, 2020, 39(3): 71-80.)
[44] 滕广青, 毕强. 知识链接的内在机理及学源演变研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2010, 33(2): 21-24.
[44] (Teng Guangqing, Bi Qiang. Research on the Inner Mechanism and Subject Origin Evolution of Knowledge Linking[J]. Information Studies: Theory & Application, 2010, 33(2): 21-24.)
[45] Brookes B C. Robert Fairthorne and the Scope of Information Science[J]. Journal of Documentation, 1974, 30(2): 139-152.
doi: 10.1108/eb026572
[46] Belkin N J, Robertson S E. Information Science and the Phenomenon of Information[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1976, 27(4): 197-204.
doi: 10.1002/asi.v27:4
[47] 卫军朝, 蔚海燕. 科学结构及演化分析方法研究综述[J]. 图书与情报, 2011(4): 48-52.
[47] (Wei Junchao, Wei Haiyan. Review on Analysis Methods of Science Structure and Evolution[J]. Library & Information, 2011(4): 48-52.)
[48] 滕广青, 贺德方, 彭洁, 等. 结构与秩序: 知识组织领域中结构主义思想的演进[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2015, 38(4): 6-10.
[48] (Teng Guangqing, He Defang, Peng Jie, et al. Structure and Order: The Evolution of Structuralism in the Field of Knowledge Organization[J]. Information Studies: Theory & Application, 2015, 38(4): 6-10.)
[49] Seufert A, von Krogh G, Bach A. Towards Knowledge Networking[J]. Journal of Knowledge Management, 1999, 3(3): 180-190.
doi: 10.1108/13673279910288608
[50] Ali Köseoglu M, Parnell J A, Yick M Y Y. Identifying Influential Studies and Maturity Level in Intellectual Structure of Fields: Evidence from Strategic Management[J]. Scientometrics, 2021, 126(2): 1271-1309.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-020-03776-z
[51] Choi J, Yi S, Lee K C. Analysis of Keyword Networks in MIS Research and Implications for Predicting Knowledge Evolution[J]. Information & Management, 2011, 48(8): 371-381.
doi: 10.1016/j.im.2011.09.004
[52] 王曰芬, 王金树, 关鹏. 主题-主题关联的学科知识网络构建与演化分析[J]. 情报科学, 2018, 36(9): 9-15.
[52] (Wang Yuefen, Wang Jinshu, Guan Peng. Research on Construction and Evolution Analysis of Discipline Knowledge Network Based on Topics Association[J]. Information Science, 2018, 36(9): 9-15.)
[53] Lucio-Arias D, Leydesdorff L. Main-Path Analysis and Path-Dependent Transitions in HistCiteTM -Based Historiograms[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2008, 59(12): 1948-1962.
doi: 10.1002/asi.v59:12
[54] 李健, 韩毅. 基于主路径的领域知识扩散演变研究——以太阳能领域为例[J]. 情报学报, 2014, 33(8): 883-891.
[54] (Li Jian, Han Yi. Evolution of Domain Knowledge Diffusion Based on Main Path: A Case Study of Solar Energy[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2014, 33(8): 883-891.)
[55] Xiao Y, Lu L Y Y, Liu J S, et al. Knowledge Diffusion Path Analysis of Data Quality Literature: A Main Path Analysis[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2014, 8(3): 594-605.
doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.05.001
[56] 祝清松, 冷伏海. 基于引文主路径文献共被引的主题演化分析[J]. 情报学报, 2014, 33(5): 498-506.
[56] (Zhu Qingsong, Leng Fuhai. Analysis of Topic Evolution Based on Co-Citation of Documents on the Main Citation Path[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2014, 33(5): 498-506.)
[57] Chen L, Xu S, Zhu L J, et al. A Semantic Main Path Analysis Method to Identify Multiple Developmental Trajectories[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2022, 16(2): Article No.101281.
[58] 滕广青. 关联驱动的领域知识群落生长[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2017, 43(3): 58-71.
[58] (Teng Guangqing. Correlation-Driven Domain Knowledge Community Growth[J]. Journal of Library Science in China, 2017, 43(3): 58-71.)
[59] 郭庆, 邓三鸿, 孔嘉, 等. 从合作网络看我国图情领域的发展演变与扩张(1998—2018)[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2021, 44(6): 90-97.
doi: 10.16353/j.cnki.1000-7490.2021.06.013
[59] Guo Qing, Deng Sanhong, Kong Jia, et al. Viewing the Development, Evolution and Expansion of Library and Information Science in China from the Co-Authorship Networks(1998-2018)[J]. Information Studies: Theory & Application, 2021, 44(6): 90-97.)
doi: 10.16353/j.cnki.1000-7490.2021.06.013
[60] Wang X G, He J, Huang H, et al. MatrixSim: A New Method for Detecting the Evolution Paths of Research Topics[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2022, 16(4): Article No.101343.
[61] 陈翔, 黄璐, 倪兴兴, 等. 基于动态语义网络分析的主题演化路径识别研究[J]. 情报学报, 2021, 40(5): 500-512.
[61] (Chen Xiang, Huang Lu, Ni Xingxing, et al. Identifying Topic Evolutionary Pathways Through Dynamic Semantic Network Analytics[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2021, 40(5): 500-512.)
[62] 张斌, 李亚婷. 知识网络演化模型研究述评[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2016, 42(5): 85-101.
[62] (Zhang Bin, Li Yating. A Review of the Evolution Model of Scientific Knowledge Network[J]. Journal of Library Science in China, 2016, 42(5): 85-101.)
[63] de Solla Price D J. Networks of Scientific Papers[J]. Science, 1965, 149(3683): 510-515.
pmid: 14325149
[64] de Solla Price D J. A General Theory of Bibliometric and Other Cumulative Advantage Processes[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1976, 27(5): 292-306.
doi: 10.1002/asi.v27:5
[65] Barabási A L, Albert R. Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks[J]. Science, 1999, 286(5439): 509-512.
doi: 10.1126/science.286.5439.509 pmid: 10521342
[66] 马费成, 刘向. 科学知识网络的演化模型[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2013, 33(2): 437-443.
doi: 10.12011/1000-6788(2013)2-437
[66] (Ma Feicheng, Liu Xiang. Evolvement Model for Scientific Knowledge Networks[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2013, 33(2): 437-443.)
doi: 10.12011/1000-6788(2013)2-437
[67] Antal T, Krapivsky P L. Weight-Driven Growing Networks[J]. Physical Review E, Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 2005, 71(2 Pt 2): Article No.026103.
[68] Pan Z F, Li X, Wang X F. Generalized Local-World Models for Weighted Networks[J]. Physical Review E, Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 2006, 73(5 Pt 2): Article No.056109.
[69] 陈果, 赵以昕. 多因素驱动下的领域知识网络演化模型:跟风、守旧与创新[J]. 情报学报, 2020, 39(1): 1-11.
[69] (Chen Guo, Zhao Yixin. A Network Evolution Model for Domain Knowledge Driven by Multiple Factors: Following Suit, Conservatism, and Innovation[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2020, 39(1): 1-11.)
[70] Abbasi A, Hossain L, Leydesdorff L. Betweenness Centrality as a Driver of Preferential Attachment in the Evolution of Research Collaboration Networks[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2012, 6(3): 403-412.
doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2012.01.002
[71] Sun X L, Kaur J, Milojević S, et al. Social Dynamics of Science[J]. Scientific Reports, 2013, 3: Article No. 1069.
[72] UKEssays. Bernard Berelson a Content Analysis Media Essay[EB/OL]. (2015-01-01). [2023-05-17]. https://www.ukessays.com/essays/media/bernard-berelson-a-content-analysis-media-essay.php?vref=1.
[73] Liu L Q, Mei S Y. Visualizing the GVC Research: A Co-Occurrence Network Based Bibliometric Analysis[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 109(2): 953-977.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-016-2100-5
[74] Web of Science[EB/OL].[2023-05-17]. https://webofscience.help.clarivate.com/zh-cn/Content/wos-core-collection/wos-full-record.htm.
[75] Liu G Y, Hu J M, Wang H L. A Co-Word Analysis of Digital Library Field in China[J]. Scientometrics, 2012, 91(1): 203-217.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0586-4
[76] Romo-Fernández L M, Guerrero-Bote V P, Moya-Anegón F. Co-Word Based Thematic Analysis of Renewable Energy (1990-2010)[J]. Scientometrics, 2013, 97(3): 743-765.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-013-1009-5
[77] Ravikumar S, Agrahari A, Singh S N. Mapping the Intellectual Structure of Scientometrics: A Co-Word Analysis of the Journal Scientometrics (2005-2010)[J]. Scientometrics, 2015, 102(1): 929-955.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-014-1402-8
[78] Jeong S, Kim H G. Intellectual Structure of Biomedical Informatics Reflected in Scholarly Events[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 85(2): 541-551.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-010-0166-z
[79] Figuerola C G, García Marco F J, Pinto M. Mapping the Evolution of Library and Information Science (1978-2014) Using Topic Modeling on LISA[J]. Scientometrics, 2017, 112(3): 1507-1535.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2432-9
[80] Sugimoto C R, Li D F, Russell T G, et al. The Shifting Sands of Disciplinary Development: Analyzing North American Library and Information Science Dissertations Using Latent Dirichlet Allocation[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011, 62(1): 185-204.
doi: 10.1002/asi.v62.1
[81] Han X Y. Evolution of Research Topics in LIS Between 1996 and 2019: An Analysis Based on Latent Dirichlet Allocation Topic Model[J]. Scientometrics, 2020, 125(3): 2561-2595.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-020-03721-0
[82] 王亮, 张绍武, 丁堃, 等. 基于HDP的汽车专利主题演化研究[J]. 情报学报, 2014, 33(9): 944-951.
[82] (Wang Liang, Zhang Shaowu, Ding Kun, et al. HDP-Based Vehicle Patent Topic Evolution[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2014, 33(9): 944-951.)
[83] 胡吉明, 陈果. 基于动态LDA主题模型的内容主题挖掘与演化[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014, 58(2): 138-142.
[83] (Hu Jiming, Chen Guo. Mining and Evolution of Content Topics Based on Dynamic LDA[J]. Library and Information Service, 2014, 58(2): 138-142.)
[84] 王康, 陈悦, 苏成, 等. 多维视角下科学主题演化分析框架[J]. 情报学报, 2021, 40(3): 297-307.
[84] (Wang Kang, Chen Yue, Su Cheng, et al. Analysis Framework for the Evolution of Scientific Themes from a Multi-Dimensional Perspective[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2021, 40(3): 297-307.)
[85] Chen B T, Tsutsui S, Ding Y, et al. Understanding the Topic Evolution in a Scientific Domain: An Exploratory Study for the Field of Information Retrieval[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2017, 11(4): 1175-1189.
doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2017.10.003
[1] Pei Wei, Sun Shuifa, Li Xiaolong, Lu Ji, Yang Liu, Wu Yirong. Medical Named Entity Recognition with Domain Knowledge[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2023, 7(3): 142-154.
[2] Deng Lu,Hu Po,Li Xuanhong. Abstracting Biomedical Documents with Knowledge Enhancement[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2022, 6(11): 1-12.
[3] Jia Minghua, Wang Xiuli. Quantifying Logical Relations of Financial Risks with BERT and Mutual Information[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2022, 6(10): 68-78.
[4] Guan Peng,Wang Yuefen,Jin Jialin,Fu Zhu. Developments of Tech-Innovation Network for Patent Cooperation: Case Study of Speech Recognition in China[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(1): 112-127.
[5] Chen Guo,Xiao Lu. Linking Knowledge Elements from Online Community[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2017, 1(11): 75-83.
[6] Xue Jianwu, Shen Caijun. Research on the Evolution of Mapping Relationship in Knowledge Base of Intelligent IETM[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2014, 30(9): 58-65.
[7] Xu Xin, Hong Yunjia. Study on Text Visualization of Clustering Result for Domain Knowledge Base —— Take Knowledge Base of Chinese Cuisine Culture as the Object[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2014, 30(10): 25-32.
[8] Hu Xinming, Luo Jianjun, Xia Huosong. Research on Interactive Recommender System Based on Commodity Domain Knowledge[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2014, 30(10): 56-62.
[9] Xue Jianwu, Gao Junping. Research on Knowledge Evolution Model of Intelligent IETM[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2012, 28(1): 27-33.
  Copyright © 2016 Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery   Tel/Fax:(010)82626611-6626,82624938   E-mail:jishu@mail.las.ac.cn