融合创新性与影响力的论文代表作遴选方法研究<sup>*</sup>

doi:10.11925/infotech.2096-3467.2023.0149

数据分析与知识发现

2024, Vol. 8

Issue (4): 88-98 https://doi.org/10.11925/infotech.2096-3467.2023.0149

研究论文

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

融合创新性与影响力的论文代表作遴选方法研究^*

刘佳程^1,²,马廷灿^1,^2,³(

),岳名亮^1,^2,³

¹中国科学院武汉文献情报中心武汉 430071
²中国科学院大学信息资源管理系北京 100190
³科技大数据湖北省重点实验室武汉 430071

Selecting Representative Papers Based on Innovation and Influence

Liu Jiacheng^1,²,Ma Tingcan^1,^2,³(

),Yue Mingliang^1,^2,³

¹National Science Library(Wuhan), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China
²Department of Information Resources Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
³Hubei Key Laboratory of Big Data in Science and Technology, Wuhan 430071, China

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章
Metrics

全文: PDF (682 KB) HTML ( 7 )
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要

【目的】 综合考虑论文的创新性和影响力，提出一种新的论文代表作遴选方法。【方法】 基于论文创新性和影响力测度指标，设计代表性指数，遴选代表性指数靠前的论文作为学者的论文代表作。以诺贝尔物理学奖获得者为例，遴选其论文代表作，将平均排名和准确率作为评价指标检验遴选方法的有效性和准确性。选取张涛院士和Hirsch J E教授进行案例分析，使用代表性指数遴选其论文代表作。【结果】 实证结果表明，与其他6种遴选方法对比，使用代表性指数遴选论文代表作在平均排名（2.838）和准确率（63.158%）两个指标上均排名第一。【局限】 使用的测度指标需要一定的引文积累，可能无法有效选出学者新近做出的重要工作。【结论】 所提论文代表作遴选方法具备可行性。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	刘佳程
	马廷灿
	岳名亮

关键词 ：论文代表作, 代表作遴选, 创新性, 影响力, 基础研究人才

Abstract：

[Objective] This study proposes a new method for selecting representative papers, considering their innovation and impact. [Methods] First, we designed a representative index based on each paper’s innovation and influence measurement. Then, we chose papers with higher representative indices as a scholar’s representative works. Taking Nobel Prize laureates in physics as an example, we selected their representative papers. We used the average ranking and precision as evaluation metrics to assess the effectiveness of the proposed model. We also analyzed Academician Zhang Tao and Professor Hirsch JE’s works using the new model and identified their representative papers. [Results] Compared with the other six methods, the proposed model ranks first in both average ranking (2.838) and precision (63.158%). [Limitations] Our metrics require citation accumulation and may not effectively identify a scholar’s recent contributions. [Conclusions] The proposed method is feasible for selecting representative papers.

Key words： Representative Papers Selection of Representative Works Innovation Influence Basic Research Talents

收稿日期: 2023-03-02 出版日期: 2024-03-01

ZTFLH:	G350
	G353

基金资助:* 中国科学院战略研究与决策支持系统建设专项(GHJ-ZLZX-2021-22-2);中国科学院青年人才专项（青年创新促进会）(2019176)

通讯作者: 马廷灿，ORCID：0000-0001-5985-384X，E-mail：matc@whlib.ac.cn。

引用本文:

刘佳程, 马廷灿, 岳名亮. 融合创新性与影响力的论文代表作遴选方法研究^*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2024, 8(4): 88-98.
Liu Jiacheng, Ma Tingcan, Yue Mingliang. Selecting Representative Papers Based on Innovation and Influence. Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery, 2024, 8(4): 88-98.

链接本文:

https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/CN/10.11925/infotech.2096-3467.2023.0149 或 https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/CN/Y2024/V8/I4/88

Table 1 论文指标计算结果示例（诺贝尔获奖者Haldane FDM部分论文计算结果）

Table 2 不同遴选方法的平均排名和准确率对比

Table 3 张涛论文代表作得分情况

Table 4 Hirsch论文代表作得分情况

[1]	中华人民共和国教育部. 教育部关于深化高校教师考核评价制度改革的指导意见[EB/OL]. [2023-02-15]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A10/s7151/201609/t20160920_281586.html.
[1]	(Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. Guiding Opinions on Deepening the Reform of the Evaluation System for University Teachers[EB/OL]. [2023-02-15]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A10/s7151/201609/t20160920_281586.html.)
[2]	中国共产党中央委员会办公厅, 中华人民共和国国务院办公厅. 关于深化项目评审、人才评价、机构评估改革的意见[EB/OL]. [2023-02-15]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2018-07/03/content_5303251.htm.
[2]	(General Office of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, General Office of the State Council of the People’s Republic of China. Opinions on Deepening the Reform of Project Evaluation, Talent Evaluation and Institutional Evaluation[EB/OL]. [2023-02-15]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2018-07/03/content_5303251.htm.)
[3]	中华人民共和国科技部. 关于破除科技评价中“唯论文”不良导向的若干措施(试行)[EB/OL]. [2023-02-15]. http://www.most.gov.cn/xxgk/xinxifenlei/fdzdgknr/fgzc/gfxwj/gfxwj2020/202002/w020200716318617342543.pdf.
[3]	(Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China. Some Measures to Eliminate the Bad Orientation of “Papers only” in Scientific and Technological Evaluation(Trial)[EB/OL]. [2023-02-15]. http://www.most.gov.cn/xxgk/xinxifenlei/fdzdgknr/fgzc/gfxwj/gfxwj2020/202002/w020200716318617342543.pdf.)
[4]	中华人民共和国教育部. 关于破除高校哲学社会科学研究评价中“唯论文”不良导向的若干意见[EB/OL]. [2023-02-15]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A13/moe_2557/s3103/202012/t20201215_505588.html.
[4]	(Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. Some Opinions on Breaking the Bad Orientation of “Papers only” in the Evaluation of Philosophy and Social Sciences Research in Colleges and Universities[EB/OL]. [2023-02-15]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A13/moe_2557/s3103/202012/t20201215_505588.html.)
[5]	中华人民共和国国务院办公厅. 国务院办公厅关于完善科技成果评价机制的指导意见[EB/OL]. [2023-02-15]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2021-08/02/content_5628987.htm.
[5]	(General Office of the State Council of the People’s Republic of China. Guiding. Opinions on Improving the Evaluation Mechanism of Scientific and Technological Achievements[EB/OL]. [2023-02-15]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2021-08/02/content_5628987.htm.)
[6]	杨瑞仙, 高鑫宁, 董克. 我国学术代表作评价研究进展[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(17): 129-140. doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2022.17.012
[6]	(Yang Ruixian, Gao Xinning, Dong Ke. Research Progress on Evaluation of Academic Representative Works in China[J]. Library and Information Service, 2022, 66(17): 129-140.) doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2022.17.012
[7]	谢珍, 马建霞, 胡文静. 学术代表作评价:方法述评与研究展望[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2021, 44(12): 190-196.
[7]	(Xie Zhen, Ma Jianxia, Hu Wenjing. Evaluation of Academic Representative Works: Methods Review and Research Prospects[J]. Information Studies: Theory & Application, 2021, 44(12): 190-196.)
[8]	王世鹏, 包翔, 宋余庆, 等. “代表作”制度的理论研究综述[J]. 情报工程, 2022, 8(2): 97-108.
[8]	(Wang Shipeng, Bao Xiang, Song Yuqing, et al. Review of the Theory Research of the “Representative Work” System[J]. Technology Intelligence Engineering, 2022, 8(2): 97-108.)
[9]	Niu Q K, Zhou J L, Zeng A, et al. Which Publication is Your Representative Work?[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2016, 10(3): 842-853.
[10]	钟华, 肖畅, 单连慧, 等. 定量分析支持的医学科研项目代表作评价[J]. 科技管理研究, 2022, 42(8): 82-87.
[10]	(Zhong Hua, Xiao Chang, Shan Lianhui, et al. Medical Scientific Research Project Representative Achievement Evaluation Supported by Quantitative Analysis[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2022, 42(8): 82-87.)
[11]	谢珍, 马建霞, 胡文静. 面向代表作评价的学术论文创新性测度方法[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2022, 45(7): 81-88. doi: 10.16353/j.cnki.1000-7490.2022.07.012
[11]	(Xie Zhen, Ma Jianxia, Hu Wenjing. The Innovation Measurement Method for Academic Papers Oriented to the Evaluation of Representative Works[J]. Information Studies: Theory & Application, 2022, 45(7): 81-88.) doi: 10.16353/j.cnki.1000-7490.2022.07.012
[12]	Zhou J L, Zeng A, Fan Y, et al. The Representative Works of Scientists[J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 17(3): 1721-1732.
[13]	中华人民共和国科技部, 中华人民共和国教育部, 中华人民共和国工业和信息化部, 等. 关于开展科技人才评价改革试点的工作方案[EB/OL]. [2023-04-05]. https://www.most.gov.cn/xxgk/xinxifenlei/fdzdgknr/qtwj/qtwj2022/202211/t20221109_183356.html.
[13]	(Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China, Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the People’s Republic of China, et al. Work Plan for Conducting Pilot Reform of Science and Technology Talent Evaluation[EB/OL]. [2023-04-05]. https://www.most.gov.cn/xxgk/xinxifenlei/fdzdgknr/qtwj/qtwj2022/202211/t20221109_183356.html.)
[14]	俞吾金. “代表作”制度改变了什么[N]. 解放日报, 2012-06-09(005).
[14]	(Yu Wujin. What has the “Representative Work” System Changed[N]. Jiefang Daily, 2012-06-09(005).)
[15]	叶继元. 代表作制有益遏制学术评价数量化[N]. 中国教育报, 2012-03-28(003).
[15]	(Ye Jiyuan. The Representative Work System is Beneficial to Curb the Formalization and Quantification of Academic Evaluation[N]. China Education Daily, 2012-03-28(003).)
[16]	姜春林, 魏庆肖. 人文社会科学代表性论文评价指标体系建构及其实现机制[J]. 甘肃社会科学, 2017(2): 97-106.
[16]	(Jiang Chunlin, Wei Qingxiao. Construction of Evaluation Index System for Representative Papers in Humanities and Social Sciences and Its Realization Mechanism[J]. Gansu Social Sciences, 2017(2): 97-106.)
[17]	任全娥. 代表性学术成果评价的图书情报学认知与阐释[J]. 扬州大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2021, 25(4): 119-128.
[17]	(Ren Quane. Cognition and Interpretation of Representative Academic Achievement Evaluation in Library and Information Science[J]. Journal of Yangzhou University(Humanities & Social Sciences), 2021, 25(4): 119-128.)
[18]	中华人民共和国人力资源和社会保障部, 中华人民共和国教育部. 关于深化高等学校教师职称制度改革的指导意见[EB/OL]. [2023-01-05]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2021-01/27/content_5583094.htm.
[18]	(Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security of the People’s Republic of China, Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. Guiding Opinions on Deepening the Reform of Teachers’ Professional Title System in Colleges and Universities[EB/OL]. [2023-02-15]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2021-01/27/content_5583094.htm.)
[19]	REF2021. Panel Criteria and Working Methods[EB/OL]. [2023-01-05]. https://www.ref.ac.uk/media/1450/ref-2019_02-panel-criteria-and-working-methods.pdf.
[20]	杨兴林. 高校教师职务晋升的学术代表作评价研究[J]. 江苏高教, 2015(2): 34-37.
[20]	(Yang Xinglin. Research on the Evaluation of Academic Representative Works for the Promotion of University Teachers[J]. Jiangsu Higher Education, 2015(2): 34-37.)
[21]	田贤鹏. 高校教师学术代表作制评价实施:动因、挑战与路径[J]. 中国高教研究, 2020(2): 85-91.
[21]	(Tian Xianpeng. Evaluation System of Academic Representative Work of University Teachers: Agent, Challenges and Path[J]. China Higher Education Research, 2020(2): 85-91.)
[22]	Faculty Opinions. Article Recommendations[EB/OL]. [2023-02-15]. https://facultyopinions.com/search/articles.
[23]	Hirsch J E. An Index to Quantify an Individual’s Scientific Research Output[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005, 102(46): 16569-16572. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0507655102 pmid: 16275915
[24]	Schubert A. Using the h-Index for Assessing Single Publications[J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 78(3): 559-565.
[25]	刘运梅, 李长玲, 冯志刚, 等. 改进的p指数测度单篇论文学术质量的探讨[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(21): 106-113. doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.21.013
[25]	(Liu Yunmei, Li Changling, Feng Zhigang, et al. Discussion of Improved p-Index Evaluating the Academic Quality of Single Paper[J]. Library and Information Service, 2017, 61(21): 106-113.) doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.21.013
[26]	Ye F Y, Leydesdorff L. The “Academic Trace” of the Performance Matrix: A Mathematical Synthesis of the h-Index and the Integrated Impact Indicator(I3)[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014, 65(4): 742-750.
[27]	孙劲楠, 丁佐奇. 基于Z指数的大学教师代表作评价研究[J]. 药学教育, 2021, 37(1): 1-6.
[27]	(Sun Jinnan, Ding Zuoqi. Research on the Evaluation of University Teachers’ Representative Works Based on Z-index[J]. Pharmaceutical Education, 2021, 37(1): 1-6.)
[28]	Egghe L. Theory and Practise of the G-Index[J]. Scientometrics, 2006, 69(1): 131-152.
[29]	姜春林, 张立伟, 张春博. 科学计量方法辅助代表作评价的探讨[J]. 情报资料工作, 2014(3): 31-36.
[29]	(Jiang Chunlin, Zhang Liwei, Zhang Chunbo. A Probe into Scientific Metrological Method-Aided Magnum Opus Evaluation[J]. Information and Documentation Services, 2014(3): 31-36.)
[30]	刘雪立, 申蓝, 郭佳, 等. 利用论文被引频次基准线遴选学者代表作的方法——以河南省学者论文为例[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2020, 31(8): 941-947. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202002280145
[30]	(Liu Xueli, Shen Lan, Guo Jia, et al. Method for Selecting Scholars’ Representative Works by Baselines of Citations: Based on the Articles of Henan Provincial Scholars[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals, 2020, 31(8): 941-947.) doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202002280145
[31]	李芙蓉, 丁佐奇. 代表性成果的有效评估——基于诺奖论文[J]. 科学观察, 2021, 16(4): 40-52.
[31]	(Li Furong, Ding Zuoqi. Evaluation of Representative Papers: Based on Nobel Prize Papers[J]. Science Focus, 2021, 16(4): 40-52.)
[32]	Bao P, Wang J H. Identifying Your Representative Work Based on Credit Allocation[C]// Proceedings of the Web Conference 2018. 2018: 5-6.
[33]	Bao P, Wang J H. Metapath-Guided Credit Allocation for Identifying Representative Works[C]// Proceedings of the Web Conference 2020. 2020: 8-9.
[34]	Chen P, Xie H, Maslov S, et al. Finding Scientific Gems with Google’s PageRank Algorithm[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2007, 1(1): 8-15.
[35]	Mazloumian A, Eom Y H, Helbing D, et al. How Citation Boosts Promote Scientific Paradigm Shifts and Nobel Prizes[J]. PLoS One, 2011, 6(5): e18975.
[36]	Funk R J, Owen-Smith J. A Dynamic Network Measure of Technological Change[J]. Management Science, 2017, 63(3): 791-817.
[37]	Wu L F, Wang D S, Evans J A. Large Teams Develop and Small Teams Disrupt Science and Technology[J]. Nature, 2019, 566: 378-382.
[38]	宋培彦, 冯超慧, 龙晨翔, 等. 基于颠覆性指数优化的细分领域优秀科技人才发现研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2022, 41(5): 61-65.
[38]	(Song Peiyan, Feng Chaohui, Long Chenxiang, et al. Study on Discovery of Outstanding Scientific and Technological Talents in Specific Domains Based on Optimized Disruptive Index[J]. Journal of Intelligence, 2022, 41(5): 61-65.)
[39]	杨京, 王芳, 白如江. 基于研究水平的单篇学术论文创新力评价研究——以碳纳米管材料领域为例[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2017, 40(9): 105-111, 76.
[39]	(Yang Jing, Wang Fang, Bai Rujiang. Evaluation of a Single Academic Paper’s Innovation Based on the Research Level[J]. Information Studies:Theory & Application, 2017, 40(9): 105-111, 76.)
[40]	杨京, 王芳, 白如江. 一种基于研究主题对比的单篇学术论文创新力评价方法[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(17): 75-83. doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.17.010
[40]	(Yang Jing, Wang Fang, Bai Rujiang. A Method to Evaluate Academic Papers’ Innovation Based on the Research Theme Comparing[J]. Library and Information Service, 2018, 62(17): 75-83.) doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.17.010
[41]	任海英, 王德营, 王菲菲. 主题词组合新颖性与论文学术影响力的关系研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(9): 87-93. doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.09.011
[41]	(Ren Haiying, Wang Deying, Wang Feifei. Relationship Between Novelty of Key-Term Combinations and Papers’ Scientific Impact[J]. Library and Information Service, 2017, 61(9): 87-93.) doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.09.011
[42]	Ding Y, Liu X Z, Guo C, et al. The Distribution of References Across Texts: Some Implications for Citation Analysis[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2013, 7(3): 583-592.
[43]	耿树青, 杨建林. 基于引用情感的论文学术影响力评价方法研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2018, 41(12): 93-98. doi: 10.16353/j.cnki.1000-7490.2018.12.017
[43]	(Geng Shuqing, Yang Jianlin. A Method to Evaluate the Academic Influence of Papers Based on Citation Sentiment[J]. Information Studies: Theory & Application, 2018, 41(12): 93-98.) doi: 10.16353/j.cnki.1000-7490.2018.12.017
[44]	Altmetric. What are Altmetrics?[EB/OL]. [2023-02-15]. https://www.altmetric.com/about-altmetrics/what-are-altmetrics/.
[45]	Priem J, Taraborelli D, Groth P, et al. Altmetrics: A Manifesto[EB/OL]. [2023-02-15]. http://altmetrics.org/manifesto.
[46]	王贤文, 方志超, 王虹茵. 连续、动态和复合的单篇论文评价体系构建研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2015, 36(8): 37-48.
[46]	(Wang Xianwen, Fang Zhichao, Wang Hongyin. Study on the Continuous, Dynamic and Comprehensive Article-Level Evaluation System[J]. Science of Science and Management of S.&T., 2015, 36(8): 37-48.)
[47]	陈建青. 对我国学术论文创新性评审的几点思考[J]. 青年记者, 2013(18): 33-35.
[47]	(Chen Jianqing. Some Thoughts on the Innovation Evaluation of Chinese Academic Papers[J]. Youth Journalist, 2013(18): 33-35.)
[48]	罗卓然, 王玉琦, 钱佳佳, 等. 学术论文创新性评价研究综述[J]. 情报学报, 2021, 40(7): 780-790.
[48]	(Luo Zhuoran, Wang Yuqi, Qian Jiajia, et al. Research Review on Innovation Evaluation of Academic Papers[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2021, 40(7): 780-790.)
[49]	Uzzi B, Mukherjee S, Stringer M, et al. Atypical Combinations and Scientific Impact[J]. Science, 2013, 342(6157): 468-472. doi: 10.1126/science.1240474 pmid: 24159044
[50]	Bornmann L, Tekles A. Disruptive Papers Published in Scientometrics[J]. Scientometrics, 2019, 120(1): 331-336. doi: 10.1007/s11192-019-03113-z
[51]	Bu Y, Waltman L, Huang Y. A Multidimensional Framework for Characterizing the Citation Impact of Scientific Publications[J]. Quantitative Science Studies, 2021, 2(1): 155-183.
[52]	Bornmann L, Tekles A. Convergent Validity of Several Indicators Measuring Disruptiveness with Milestone Assignments to Physics Papers by Experts[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2021, 15(3): 101159.
[53]	Leydesdorff L, Tekles A, Bornmann L. A Proposal to Revise the Disruption Indicator[J]. El Profesional de la Información, 2021, 30(1): e300121.
[54]	刘小慧, 沈哲思, 廖宇, 等. 科研论文颠覆性指数的改进及其影响因素研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(24): 84-91. doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2020.24.010
[54]	(Liu Xiaohui, Shen Zhesi, Liao Yu, et al. The Research about the Improved Disruption Index and Its Influencing Factors[J]. Library and Information Service, 2020, 64(24): 84-91.) doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2020.24.010
[55]	刘小慧, 廖宇, 朱曼曼. 颠覆性指数用于科研评价初探[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2021, 44(12): 34-40.
[55]	(Liu Xiaohui, Liao Yu, Zhu Manman. A Preliminary Study on the Application of Disruption Index to Scientific Research Evaluation[J]. Information Studies: Theory & Application, 2021, 44(12): 34-40.)
[56]	Clarivate. Indicators Handbook[EB/OL]. [2023-02-15]. https://incites.help.clarivate.com/Content/Indicators-Handbook/ih-normalized-indicators.htm?Highlight=CNCI.
[57]	APS. APS Data Sets for Research[EB/OL]. [2023-02-15]. https://journals.aps.org/datasets.
[58]	The Nobel Prize. All Nobel Prizes in Physics[EB/OL]. [2023-02-15]. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/lists/all-nobel-prizes-in-physics/.
[59]	Li J C, Yin Y A, Fortunato S, et al. A Dataset of Publication Records for Nobel Laureates[J]. Scientific Data, 2019, 6: 33. doi: 10.1038/s41597-019-0033-6 pmid: 31000709
[60]	Sinatra R, Wang D S, Deville P, et al. Quantifying the Evolution of Individual Scientific Impact[J]. Science, 2016, 354(6312): aaf5239.
[61]	Shen H W, Barabási A L. Collective Credit Allocation in Science[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 2014, 111(34): 12325-12330.
[62]	中国科学院. 院士信息[EB/OL]. [2023-02-15]. https://casad.cas.cn/sourcedb_ad_cas/zw2/ysxx/hxb/201312/t20131219_4001995.html.
[62]	(Chinese Academy of Sciences. Academician Information[EB/OL]. [2023-02-15]. https://casad.cas.cn/sourcedb_ad_cas/zw2/ysxx/hxb/201312/t20131219_4001995.html.)
[63]	Wikipedia. Jorge E. Hirsch[EB/OL]. [2023-02-15]. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jorge_E._Hirsch.
[64]	Qiao B T, Wang A Q, Yang X F, et al. Single-Atom Catalysis of CO Oxidation Using Pt₁/FeO_x[J]. Nature Chemistry, 2011, 3(8): 634-641. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1095 pmid: 21778984
[65]	Yang H B, Hung S F, Liu S, et al. Atomically Dispersed Ni(I) as the Active Site for Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction[J]. Nature Energy, 2018, 3(2): 140-147.
[66]	Ji N, Zhang T, Zheng M Y, et al. Direct Catalytic Conversion of Cellulose into Ethylene Glycol Using Nickel-Promoted Tungsten Carbide Catalysts[J]. Angewandte Chemie(International Ed in English), 2008, 47(44): 8510-8513.
[67]	The Canadian Academy of Engineering. Fifty-Two New Fellows Elected into the Canadian Academy of Engineering[EB/OL]. [2023-02-15]. https://www.cae-acg.ca/fifty-two-new-fellows-elected-into-the-canadian-academy-of-engineering/.
[68]	Zhao X C, Zhang Q, Chen C M, et al. Aromatic Sulfide, Sulfoxide, and Sulfone Mediated Mesoporous Carbon Monolith for Use in Supercapacitor[J]. Nano Energy, 2012, 1(4): 624-630.
[69]	Liu X Y, Wang A Q, Wang X D, et al. Au-Cu Alloy Nanoparticles Confined in SBA-15 as a Highly Efficient Catalyst for CO Oxidation[J]. Chemical Communications, 2008(27): 3187-3189. doi: 10.1039/b804362k pmid: 18594737
[70]	Hirsch J E. Spin Hall Effect[J]. Physical Review Letters, 1999, 83(9): 1834-1837.
[71]	Wikipedia. Spin Hall Effect[EB/OL]. [2023-02-15]. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin_Hall_effect.
[72]	Hirsch J E. Attractive Interaction and Pairing in Fermion Systems with Strong On-Site Repulsion[J]. Physical Review Letters, 1985, 54(12): 1317-1320. pmid: 10030994
[73]	Hirsch J E, Fye R M. Monte Carlo Method for Magnetic Impurities in Metals[J]. Physical Review Letters, 1986, 56(23): 2521-2524. pmid: 10033014
[74]	Hirsch J E. Two-Dimensional Hubbard Model: Numerical Simulation Study[J]. Physical Review B, 1985, 31(7): 4403-4419. pmid: 9936373

[1]	马斯佳, 赵悦, 童元元, 孟凡红, 李志勇, 李彦文. 基于权重学术迹的中医药学者学术影响力评价方法研究*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2023, 7(8): 163-174.
[2]	翟羽佳, 周睿, 李岩, 毛志刚. 科研人员跨学科性与个体学术影响力的因果效应分析^*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2023, 7(11): 140-157.
[3]	王烨桐, 江涛. 通过重叠社区结构识别社交网络中的影响力节点^*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2022, 6(12): 80-89.
[4]	韩康康,徐建民,张彬. 融合用户兴趣和多维信任度的微博推荐^*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2020, 4(12): 95-104.
[5]	仇丽青,贾玮,范鑫. 基于重叠社区的影响力最大化算法 ^*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(7): 94-102.
[6]	赵明清,武圣强. 基于微博情感分析的股市加权预测方法研究^*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(2): 43-51.
[7]	景东, 张大勇. 社交媒体环境下用户信任度评估与传播影响力研究^*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2018, 2(7): 26-33.
[8]	刘俊婉, 杨波, 王菲菲. 基于引证行为与学术相似度的学者影响力领域排名方法研究^*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2018, 2(4): 59-70.
[9]	陈芬, 付希, 何源, 薛春香. 融合社会网络分析与影响力扩散模型的微博意见领袖发现研究^*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2018, 2(12): 60-67.
[10]	史昱天, 朱庆华, 赵宇翔, 陈晓威. 基于链接分析法对国内网络直播平台综合影响力的评价研究^*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2017, 1(9): 40-48.
[11]	范如霞, 曾建勋, 高亚瑞玺. 基于合作网络的学者动态学术影响力模式识别研究[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2017, 1(4): 30-37.
[12]	何跃, 尹小佳, 朱超. 基于情感及影响力的微博用户群体特征分析——以A手机为例[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2017, 1(10): 12-20.
[13]	俞立平. *来源指标与被引指标关系及对期刊评价的影响^——以JCR数学期刊为例**[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2016, 32(7-8): 94-100.
[14]	何建民,殷澍. 社会关系网络中影响力用户发现方法研究^*[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2016, 32(4): 20-30.
[15]	邓启平, 王小梅. 利用LeaderRank识别有影响力的作者[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2015, 31(9): 60-67.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed